One Brief Illustration of Authenticity

15th
Feb. × ’10

_IGP0834

The other day we were walking by Santo Domingo on the cobblestone apron that fans out beside the church when our attention focused on two grubby street kids, climbing up a pile of sand left over from construction and then throwing themselves back down, gleefully.  They gave little puppy shrieks and pummeled the sand lovingly as they wriggled up and rolled down.  I knelt and snapped a picture.

The picture shows a Dickensian little boy in a torn blue sweater and tattered trousers, barefoot; staring surprised at the camera, his mouth is a delicate ‘o.’  He is directly in the middle of the sandpile, as if he’s levitating before the sand.

“No fotos!” the boy said, snapping to attention. “10 pesos.”  He charged down the pile and stood defiantly in front of me.

I had to laugh.  Normally I sternly refused any begging from these kids, but this was different ; the little guy was obviously sharp and understood the tourist mentality.  I’m cute, I’m ethnic, I have a slight air of conflict and tragedy about me, and this makes an ideal photo.  But the trick the photo can’t capture is that it costs ten pesos.

The boy laid out the terms but, being a kid — even a street kid for whom money is real and felt — couldn’t really care about following through with them when there was a big pile of sand to be climbed.  And I’d lost the desire for a photo when the dynamics of the transaction had been laid out like that.  He raced back to his mountain, I lowered my camera.

So it goes — even I, who fancy myself the hardened cynic who’ll have none of authenticity this, authenticity that, had been trumped once again by the authentic.  I wanted my token photo of the worn and dirty little dude doing something kid-like, going on with his childhood in the simplest way even while his mom begged for money in the Zocolo or sold roses.  But he turned that around real fast.  So much for precious childhood in rags, gringa, unless you’re willing to cough up a fat ten peso coin for it.

There’s nothing wrong with this kid’s instinct other than the fact that it subverts the nature of our relationship right there, on the spot, and destroys any illusion I have about being the benevolent observer of a tragic but touching and authentic reality.  And fair enough.  Me and my kind have been a part of that reality for a long time, have in fact helped shape it.  This little guy was both immediately and constantly aware of that.

For as much as his response, all tiny wrinkled knees and insubordinate elbows camped in front of me, pulled the plug out of my this-is-Oaxaca moment it also gave me hope.  Good for him.  Sure, it may not be the best sign that he sees tourists as mere cash machines, but in a way, they are and they prove it again and again and again.  But beyond this, beyond the raw capitalist interaction that makes me cringe, is a positive instinct.  He isn’t going to sit back and cower and let people come and champion his authenticity.  He knows what people want, and he knows how to use that to his advantage.  Who’s to say that little dude someday couldn’t be a tourist guide, couldn’t start up some small business?

Now that I’ve been beaten back by the mocking, cynical cries of the peanut gallery telling me, “Are you insane?  Still hopelessly naive after so many years in Mexico?” I’ll say that yes, this boy has a very small chance of becoming a tourist guide, of starting his own business.  But at least I can find some hope in that instinct, and instead of seeing it as the pin in my bubble I can see it as a sign of growing agency and self-awareness on his part, which may someday lead to something other than life in the street.

On with the story.

The boy’s even littler, pudgy-cheeked buddy in a cheap woolen hat followed his friend’s lead to the tee, posing an elbow on his hip and staring at me for a moment, sizing up just what I wanted.  Then he threw himself back into the sand and tried to roll uphill.

I watched them for a moment.  Photography has given me the capacity to do this.  Stop and absorb a scene and the potential story behind it.

“How ‘bout this,” I said.  They stopped climbing, perched at different heights on the pile.

“I get to take a picture, and you can give a treat to my dog.”  Scrap the “I’ll observe you as the tourist observes the locals in their local culture” game, scrap the adorable heart-wrenchingness of authentic Oaxacan reality, this is gonna be an exchange, pure and simple.  Jorge was standing nearby with the Stella who, with her long, smooth Shepherd body, her pointed ears and her thick black fur was a spectacle right out of the far reaches of a kid’s imagination.  They gawked at her.  Street kids, for the most part, do not fear the Stella.  They do not have the upbringing and the cautious familial/societal membrane of protection around them to worry about things like getting bitten by dogs.  They are reckless and straightforward, they want to test the limits of the world around them in ways that seem violent compared with those of other children.

“Sale!” shouted the older one.  Meaning in this context, “it’s on, it’s a deal.”  He went charging down his little mountainside and stood directly in front of me.  Jorge brought up the Stella as if we were setting up an elaborate magic trick.

“Sit, Stella,” I said.  She sat, singly focused on the rawhide.  The little boy gaped with nervous, barely held together anticipation.

“Put it flat on your hand,” I explained, “lay it flat like that so that she doesn’t get your fingers when she grabs it, ok?”

He nodded.  His buddy observed anxiously from the side, his admiration for his friend cemented for life.

The blue-sweatered boy held out his hand firmly and flatly to the Stella, who sucked up the rawhide like a horse inhaling a sugar cube.  The boy screamed in delight.

“Now you,” I said to the little guy.  He gaped at me with rounded eyes.

“Flat.” He said.  “Flat flat flat!”  He stuck out his hand.

His coin-sized palm was hardly big enough to hold a rawhide.  I set it down carefully and guided his hand towards the dog, who reached out as if to swallow his arm whole and then zeroed in on the rawhide, slurping it up and leaving a trail of drool.

The boy jumped up and down and then went racing into the sandpile, assailing it full-force with his body as if he didn’t know what to do with the thrill of feeding a wild animal.

His older friend followed him and moments later they were hurling themselves down, crawling back up, flailing around the sand as if they’d never met me.  We kept going on our walk.  I didn’t take another photo.

Posted in Authenticity, Culture, Dogs | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

The Luxury Orbit

13th
Feb. × ’10

IMG_3637

The hotel I stayed at in London aims for the opulent.  Marble is its material of choice. It bases its décor off of nearby Marble Arch, a hulking bastion of European aristocracy that still stiffens its shoulders with self-importance across the street from Starbucks and mega department stores and London’s bleached blonde teenagers in Ugg boots.  At the hotel, desks are smooth, drapes are thick, ceilings are high, wood is polished into shiny submission, edges are as tamed as the desk staff.  Everyone cooes and purrs and smiles and invites.  People call you “Ms.” with deference as a necessary gesture of distinction between you and them, placing it before every sentence as if it were a protective screen separating you from unsavoury elements.

The hotels’ floors are plush, deep carpet into which, presumably, one’s thousand dollar heels should sink erotically.  I padded along on them in beaten dusty gym shoes trekked from Mexico to go running in the gym, where I had a moment of existential alienation running solo in a room full of expensive unused gym equipment and glass bottles of sparkling water.  Boom boom boom boom boom boom went the pounding of my feet on the treadmill, and I watched my ponytail bounce and jerk in the mirror under the carefully dimmed lighting.  A Fitzgeraldian feeling crept up.  Cool smooth spaces lit in the colors of velvet and fur, detached boozy money seeping from their corners.  It seemed easy enough to wind up drunk in a silk slip dress, singing in a sumptuous booth with depressed abandon, tramping Zelda-style through a wasted life.  Maybe that’s when I started thinking about luxury.

Roaming the hotel, I felt like I was walking around someone’s fine china cabinet in a dream, trying not to break anything or jostle anyone or move too quickly.  The tall woman with the stiffly manicured hair in the elevator whose coat probably cost the equivalent of my yearly salary must be used to moving this way, I thought.  I tried to keep my body from interfering with the terrible gravity of heavy, stately objects.

The alienness was like another me, a potential me I examined carefully with little nudges and prods.  What made this me in her shoes and her dresses and her ever-so-thoughtfully put together thoughts so bizarre?   It wasn’t just the fact that I can typically be found in the Tlacolula market in a thrift store sundress eating barbacoa from a plastic plate.  It wasn’t simply a difference in context, in income.  It wasn’t just the lamps or the soaps or the pillows fluffed to plumpness on the bed or the TV in the bathtub.  Those are not features of any trip I would ever usually take, for sure, but they themselves weren’t what made for the strangeness.

No, it was something else.  It was the feeling of being on an elevated plane, shuttled here and there and never quite touching anything.  It was the feeling of travel as consumption and not as life.  In the stupor of jet lag, sitting on a puffy stool with a view of Marble Arch’s Georgian homes stacked in straight-faced grays and browns towards the park, I thought about just how different this type of travel was from all the travel I’d ever done.

I didn’t realize how separate this travel world was until I was present in it; it had seemed like it must just be the difference of carpets and towels.  But no: it’s a distinct way of seeing and experiencing (or not experiencing).  It is a view from above, a view from that orbit that wealthy people make around the world, not quite coming into contact with it.

For the first time I realized that for so many people, this is travel.  You go to a luxury hotel for the weekend, pop into a city for a day or two, eat a meal and see a show and go home travel-happy.  And there is nothing necessarily wrong with that – perhaps they learn as much in a weekend, see as much from the safety of starred restaurants and nice hotel rooms, as a random backpacker does from a drunken gaze off the hostel balcony.  But to me, it felt nothing like travel.  There was none of the fear or the exhilaration, none of the not-knowing.   Rather, it felt like a sharp and expensive cheese you’re supposed to gush on about but that really makes your nose itch.

So let me say : I’m not going to heave myself into a rant about luxury hotels and upscale restaurants and their sameness or their-lack-of-representing-the-local-population, nor am I going to tsk-tsk those who love their quiet rooms with mini bars and weighty robes to go get themselves a falling down pee-reeking craphole of a hostel.  But I can say that the feeling developed throughout the trip, a few notes teased out in the beginning building to a crescendo by the end, that this is not the way I want to travel or the way I want to live.

When I started traveling, I rolled t-shirts into tiny balls and rattled along Peru in buses, eating empanadas from baskets on the side of the road.  And this has become my travel aesthetic and ethic now – as close as possible to the ground.  Quite literally – I hate flying.  But I’m also not so interested in high-flying lifestyles.  I’m not even sure they’re not representative of a place or not authentic enough, an insult I might’ve hurled at them years ago.  If I were going to take a strike at the “authenticity” of monied luxury then I’d say that the distinctness of upper classes everywhere is going to be somewhat watered down by the cross-cultural principles of international finance.  The upper classes of London will have the same shoes, the same hats, the same bags as their counterparts around the world (fashionistas might point out regional differences, to which I respond with the old adage about Eskimos and snow). They wear the same genteel watches set to different times.  But they are London as much as the Bangladeshi immigrants on Brick Lane; behind their globalized sameness are the decisions and politics and preferences and most importantly, the funds that shape the local culture.  It’s not that they are irrelevant or less “real” to the meaning of a place; it’s just that they interest me far less than the people whose lives are shaped by their money.

This is not to say that I wouldn’t appreciate the chance to escape some of the $5 hotels we’ve stayed at, where toilets have fallen over and strange men have hung their undies on our windows.  Besides, I can feel my friends in Japan countering, who doesn’t love good sheets?  Sure.  But there is a point between the forced ascetic torture of hostels and the plasma screen TV in the bathtub at the hotel.  It’s comfort.  And beyond comfort, beyond the basics that keep me energized, I don’t need much else.  Traveling has made that clear to me.  I don’t need stuff (by stuff, I’m talking about footrests and throw pillows, not diapers or pans or basic essentials).  And I suppose that was what made the luxurious mirage so jarring : it’s a me and a world defined and shaped by stuff, the love of stuff, the protection of stuff, the smug having of stuff.  I could see very clearly in London that I don’t need stuff, and for that I felt incredibly grateful.  A lot of people try to not want stuff, but they’re tied to half-hearted jobs and sofas.  I can understand and sympathize with this.  But I hope, I really hope, to have escaped that inertia, and I think so far I have.  The quality of my life is defined by experiences : by sun and writing and friendships and beer and dogs.  This is the gift travel has given me.

So for as lovely as London was, I was glad to leave the luxed up me behind.  I miss the whisky, hell yes.  And that bathtub…but more than anything in London and Glasgow I missed my Oaxacan luxuries, the ones that aren’t so heavy and weighted with status and money.  The massive tree outside our window.  The dog.  The dry sweet smell of the air in Oaxaca, grasses and dirt and laurel trees.  Geraniums on the patio.  Chilaquiles in a clay pot.  The freedom to wake up and have coffee and write, a freedom to live without being sucked into a job I hate or stuff I feel the need to accumulate or rhythms I long to escape. That is my ultimate luxury: a life of my own design.  And I am grateful for the opportunity to recognize that this is something many people — both wealthy and poor – don’t have.  So perhaps the goal of every trip is to remind myself of that – I am privileged enough to make up my life as I go along, to really be present in it and think about it and appreciate it without wanting for basic necessities and without wanting for excess.  That awareness transcends luxury – it’s contentment or presence or balance or maybe, just a cup of coffee and some words on the page.

Posted in Trips, identity | Tagged , | 9 Comments

The Never-Ending Cycles of Cultural Adjustment

7th
Feb. × ’10

watermark

The stages of cultural adjustment have been written about a lot.  It’s nothing new to highlight the honeymoon stage, the hostility stage, the acceptance stage, and the (somewhat dubious and too often too early too triumphantly declared) home stage.  Here in Oaxaca that might be called the mole-n’-chapulines stage, the WTF traffic/construction/machismo/why-does-it-take-30-minutes-to-get-that-coffee-I-ordered? stage, the oh-Mexico stage, and the “bienvenidos a casa” stage.

These are in no way, however, fixed stages.  It’s not like in January you’re in rapture, in March it’s persistent corrupting bitterness, in June you’re awash in a warm fuzzy glow of acceptance and in September you’re a born Mexican.  Unfortunately, it goes in cycles.  Kind of like food poisoning.  Just when you’re breathing shallowly, clutching your gut on the bed and thinking, “oh, it’s over, the worst has passed, I don’t care about being whistled at on the street anymore and I’m just going to eat Ritz and drink Sprite and feel alive again” then BOOM you’re heaving it all out, restraining the urge to throw chile-covered mangos at the dude in the street.  It never fails.  So, in cultural adjustment as in the curse of the tainted taco, you’ve just gotta ride it out.

My friend got hit with an unexpected bout of it recently.  I suppose it’s not really unexpected – his dog was almost attacked by another dog, his girlfriend was robbed, the city is being ripped up Mexican-style with no rhyme or reason, meaning you turn a corner to find a previously navigable street a chaotic ruin of dirt, concrete, and yellow-hatted men perilously jerking around in bulldozers.  I left him on the verge of a fall into the hostility stage and, unfortunately, did little to quell it.  “Yeah, sorry,” I shrugged in sympathy, “and hey, I’m going to stuff myself with cheddar cheese and microbrews!  Cheerio!”  It’s hard, when you’ve pulled out of one of those stages or are evading it by jaunting northward, to indulge in it vicariously as a sympathetic gesture.  I guess the lure of the expat frustration is so great that you’ve got to fend it off with all of your powers – you can’t let yourself be tainted by association.

So when I got back he was full on in the grips of it, the paroxysms of irritation taking him by storm on a daily basis.  I have nothing but empathy for him; I have been there many times before.  He got me thinking about just how hard it is.  I’ll take a moment here for all of you stuck in the slug of six months of gray, dragging winter, or mired in jobs you don’t like or wishing you could down a fresh-squeezed orange juice for a buck to hate me for saying this.  Go ahead, I don’t mind.  But really, this expat thing is hard: yes, in developing countries it can be a physical challenge, trying not to get fired up about the want of basic services (where’s the damn gas truck we called two hours ago?) or the choking traffic or the faulty boiler, but it’s not really the physical challenge that’s so hard.  Which is why I don’t think that expats only face these stages and hurdles in developing countries, although perhaps they’re more pronounced in these countries.

I think the hardest thing about expat life is the inner battle – the struggle to get beyond judgments and frustrations and the old reliable tendency to look down on the host culture in order (to borrow a line from a Jon Katz book on dog training I love) to be a better damned human.  This does not, read, does not mean glossing over Mexican or Italian or whatever culture as a precious flower to be admired on the basis of difference alone.  I don’t want to fall into the cultural relativism void.  What it means is learning how to navigate the maddening along with the captivating, and to distill one’s hostility so that in the end it becomes part of a deeper empathy.   This doesn’t mean spouting maudlin, vaguely condescending platitudes about how “it’s just the poverty that makes them want to rob us, really, poor guy, he’s got a family to feed.”  It means finding or creating the capacity to roll all the anger and the annoyance up with the awe and the gratefulness, the true overwhelming gratefulness that comes at times to be living in another culture and another place and to discover and marvel at it, and to take them both in with the kind of complex love attached to home.  The foreign culture doesn’t have to be home and you don’t have to lay out the cheery faux grass welcome mat to try to make it such – but by allowing it to be complicated and maddening, familiar and empathetic, you give it the depth and the freedom of home.  You allow it to be many things at once.

Doesn’t mean, of course, that there aren’t moments and days when you want to scream in the middle of the street, “IS IT TOO MUCH TO ASK TO STOP FOR A PEDESTRIAN, A-HOLE??!?!”  These moments or days might be followed by a misty staring off into the distance over a plate of barbacoa and a shot of mezcal, mentally gushing over Mexico like a study abroad student in love.  That’s just how it goes.

I still find it so hard not to get taken too far in either direction, not to be filled with resentment or oozing with gratefulness.  It comes in ups and downs and ups and downs and I still can’t find the steadiness.  I still believe in trying, though, and I guess that’s what counts.  When you lose that – give up the struggle to balance the inevitable irritation with the amusement and awe — I think you lose the point of living abroad.  It might be time to go.

Sometimes, as in China with Jorge and I, the experience simply leans too far to one side and you’ve got to acknowledge that and take off.  After a year in Beijing that was it, I was done, there was no delicate back and forth to be had any longer.  But Mexico is different.  I think anywhere I live, the U.S included since it has now become for me just another country with another bizarre frustrating/illuminating culture to be navigated, there will be the up and the down and the push and the pull.  So the question is in what place are you willing to commit yourself to the back-and-forth of it, in what place are you willing to work to make yourself a more insightful, more committed, more empathetic human, to love your cultural partner through the fights and the vows and the needy spells?  In what place are you willing to come home sweaty with frustration and go out again and shake it off and love it the next day because in the end, it’s worth it?

Right now, I say, I’ll do that for Mexico.  I live in constant fear of being overtaken by the hostility stage, of cycling too far into it to get out.  Commiserating with my friend, who months ago was still bouncy and shiny with Oaxaca delirium, reminds me that this too, this googly-eyed rapture over the blue skies and the food and the morning runs on the Cerro Fortin, will end.  And hopefully, start up again.  And I’ll let myself get yanked along with it, wanting to become a better, deeper person in the process.  Wanting at least to find a stronger empathy within the up and down and round and round.  A single sock, let’s say, floating in zen in the center of the washer cycle with all the honeymoon-hostility-acceptance-home stages swirling around it.  That’s where I want my heart to be; the suspended sock, untouched by the rattling fluctuations, just happy to be there and to be a part of it.

Posted in Culture, identity | Tagged , , , | 16 Comments

Travel Whisky

5th
Feb. × ’10

IMG_3460

IMG_3470-1

IMG_3353

IMG_3376

IMG_3476

IMG_3635

IMG_3814

IMG_3816

IMG_3896

IMG_3945

IMG_3947

IMG_3983

So much travel fare seems to treat travel as the concrete experience of places, people, events.  Go here, do that, eat this.  Top 10! How to!  Where, when, why: timetables, addresses, translations, names.  You will taste vinegar and you will see red phone booths and you will experience the gray established oldness of Europe.  Satisfied, you will fold up the guidebook, crumple up your lists, and go home.

But it’s not that.  Travel may hit you over the head initially with the concrete, but it sinks in slowly and indefinitely in the abstract.  It’s a gulp of potent alcohol that burns initially but then eases into diverging trails of taste.  It gets you drunk slowly – at first you think you can define that trace of peatiness, the woody, sultry elements, the malt, you think you can sort out the elements one by one in neat succession, but eventually you wind up in a slow-swirling fog of perceptions that keep colliding with one another and overlapping.  Travel ferments in you.

The gulps and burps of fermentation have already started in my brain and I can still hear the popping.  There’s the Arch hotel library with it’s high windows giving out onto the placid front of Madonna’s house, the gritty taste of haggis nestled between nips and tatties, the soft pies and ales and cheeses, the swapped stories of New York life, the white British bathtubs, the whir and buzz of airplane engines, the myopic views of city lights from above, the shacks bumping shoulders on the outskirts of Mexico City on arrival, the flooded streets, water sloshing up against the windshields of cars, the familiar hills of Oaxaca at night dusted with lights, all wooshing around in my head making a delirious, complex liquor.

Trav-el-ling, each syllable weighted.  Each time I roll it around on my tongue it takes on different flavors and meanings.  It contains all the varied manifestations and shapes of restlessness, from the desire to be in a moving vehicle listening to a certain song with a book on one’s lap to the need to uproot one’s life and move 14,000 miles away.  It contains a concept of home that’s constantly defined and shaped by away, and a sense of away that becomes part of home.

A broken-down bus chugging across South America is the baseline, the elemental bottom of my travel whisky.  The particular grain from a particular year (in my case, 2004) on which the whisky is based. The fermentation process – Chinese alleyways, Japanese apartments and universities, Mexican cafes and sweating sugar cane fields – has been different and varied but always loops back to the base note for inspiration.  There’s some star anise in there, some dumpling steam, rattling trains and Sichuan peppers, white sand beaches and the gorged leaves of Bornean rainforests, but all of it returns to that simple underlying note of the rumble of buses across the pampas.

Occasionally, through the stupor of the whisky comes the why.  Humans have evolved to not be shocked and stimulated by their environment every new day.  Travel is anathema to this little evolutionary strategy.  So perhaps, in that light, traveling is a bizarre mutation.  It remains to be seen whether it’s a healthy one for humankind or not.  Maybe it’s a mutation thrown into the mix to move humans from complacent stability to heightened sensitivity to difference and detail; to evolve humans into creatures of a persistent, insatiable creativity and curiosity.  Perhaps its meant to satiate the positive desire humans increasingly have to escape the confines of their own dinky repetitive little self-consciousnesses; to jolt them into a hunger for awareness that makes them more empathetic, more connected to other people and the world at large.

I’ll tell myself that since I can barely see straight from exhaustion.  I’ll tell myself that because sometimes I can feel the part of myself (what would we call it, the pragmatic part?  the rational one? the “normal” one? – who might have a steadily unfolding career and a home and who might follow the neat narrative arc of those established life stages) step back and say, wait a minute, what? Why are you here and there, woman?

When a friend asks me, “Why do you always need to go?” I don’t know what to say.  I can list all the factors – the checklist of symptoms…but it’s not enough.  The real why nags at me from someplace I can only circumvent with curiosity like a boat swirling on the rings of an eddy.  The real why is the subtle flavor deep in the whisky you can’t quite put your finger on, which lingers a little longer than the others.

Posted in Place, Trips | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments