Bottomless cup of coffee.
“What is it that made them so American?” my friend asked on the phone.
“Well,” I hesitated, “I don’t know…they played volleyball shirtless on the beach? They had this cheery, earnest quality spiked by a pip sort of sarcasm? Their clothes? The way the intonation of their sentences always so definitively went down at the end unless they said “WhAT?” The magazines they read? Their gadgets? Their solid confidence and the way, even though they came as a group, they all completely and instinctually did their own things and split off and came together at random times in a way a group in other places, like China or Mexico, never would? Their banter?”
I went on and on, one quality of observed Americanness emerging after another , like divers rising to the surface of a lake. Eventually, I satisfied him and we moved on to other topics.
But the topic nagged me later. The qualities I’d identified didn’t sit right; not because they felt false, but because they skirted the essence of something else, a deeper and separate point. It wasn’t until I started thinking about Pittsburgh, and about what I will feel like walking to class in an American city and sitting in an American coffee shop with no plane ticket elsewhere, no foreign address, that I realized what the explanation was. The friends of friends who’d come to the wedding weren’t American in any outstanding or obnoxious way, and the issue wasn’t so much that I felt isolated from them but rather that their Americanness was so complete, so divorced from the otherness that has for the past six years been the yin to my American yang, their Americanness was as solid as the Mexicanness you’ll find over a round of micheladas at El Rey de Oro, without a sliver of reflective outsiderness, of marvel, of distance, of conflict, without the spark of the recognition of absurdity.
And then what I was seeing wasn’t their Americanness but my Americanness in an entirely new context – that of the American who lives in the U.S, within U.S culture, without quite realizing it, without pondering it, just being within it and moving on to think about and do other things, culture and place a given in a way they can never quite be overseas. That of the American who belongs without the shivering awareness of belonging or not belonging, the blanket of inclusion muffling the fear and exhilaration, the sharp sensory alertness of foreignness.
It was terrifying. I hadn’t understood until then that my Americanness has become a bizarre, somewhat precious quality, has become something I reflect on in the same way I might reflect on the British tendency to be painstakingly polite or the French need to make overly conclusive statements. I’ve been able to observe my Americanness from the outside in for the past six years, picking apart the characteristics that make it distinct, the tendencies and convictions, the attitudes and biases. All that attention to it as an identity set apart, discrete from its surroundings and particular in its context and influences and background, has made it more personal, more special. My Americanness: a love for giant supermarkets and wilderness. A way of speaking (“DUDE!”). Self-righteousness. Sarcasm and a biting sense of humor. Earnestness.
All of this has become part of my identity, a part I consider American in a way I probably never would have had I spent the last six years in the U.S., and which is set apart from other parts of my identity which I can only define as not American, as pulling against the inclinations of Americanness. Maybe this happens to many people who go abroad, expats and exiles and immigrants; they become so cognizant of their own distant culture and their relationship to it (real or imagined) that they come to both identify with it and separate themselves from it in ways they never would have at home.
The quality of Americanness has also become an important part of the way I relate to other people – my friendships with Americans here are centered around the unspoken recognition of our mutual tendencies to get into raging debates about Tiger Woods or reminisce about camp dinners of Mac n’ Cheese or even just say “Yeah…” in a drawn-out way or “Oh my GOD” or “WOW.”
These are rare and valued things overseas, and for as much as the wet-behind-the-ears study abroad student or the hippie gone native in beads and Thai fisherman pants may extol the virtues of friendships with only the locals (the travel term I’ve come to loathe most recently) I can say now that friendships with people from one’s own culture can be lifeboats in a sea of alienation, as long as they don’t become lifeboats drifting forever on waves of bitching and resentment. Not only do they let you temporarily escape constant, calculated and active immersion in another culture and the sometimes blasting loneliness and isolation that come with it, but they also give your own identity and your own culture another dimension. A third dimension. Americanness becomes a limited and exclusive secret, a remote shared past, and you and your compatriots both fervently and secretly possess it and review it in the way two old friends meeting up in a bar in L.A might both unspeakingly and openly share the stories of their childhoods in a tiny Wisconsin town.
But in the U.S., Americanness will not be this anymore. Not exclusive, not precious or rare, not strange, and not nearly as examinable from the outside, even if I can still rear back from it for a long hard look. I will move to Pittsburgh in the fall and at first everything will have that mesmerizing sheen of travel, and I’ll be drawn to the details of café culture and the layout of streets and football games and people running in beanies and leggings by the river and it will all be a big marvelous puzzle of details to revel in, and then, soon enough, I’ll be stopping by for bagels at some busy shop in the morning and talking about the latest HBO series and reading a magazine over coffee somewhere and I’ll be another American, in the United States, back within “my” culture and with no other me, no foreign me, no outsiderness; all of those things I once pondered and was fond of as peculiar, singular qualities just part of the slipstream of everyday interactions and everyday life in the USA.
So the question that gnaws at me is: Will my perspective become dulled by routine and belonging, by speaking the language, by not having the protective layer of foreignness to make everything interesting, everything challenging and rewarding, everything worthy of concentration?
Or, as I hope, have I become so much of a traveler that this, too, will be travel, three years in a land that has already over the past six years become foreign, taking notes at tailgate parties for Steelers games and exploring malls and old factories with the hunger and the tireless, probing, ecstatic way of seeing of the traveler?
Perhaps, and this was the ultimate comfort I found stewing over my friend’s question in the days after our conversation, writing will become travel – writing requires the same constant state of awareness, the same relentless pushing beyond assumptions and givens and facile conclusions, beyond the neat narratives etched on the surface, and writing which is determined and passionate and committed enough can make anything, ice cream in the afternoon or a coon hound in the forest or a late morning nap or even the creeping influence of routine and belonging in one’s home country, interesting.
Writing will have to become travel, and will have to turn into the telescope and the distance through which I observe my own culture. This is what I tell myself.
What makes them so American? My friend asked. They take it for granted. They are American and they don’t think about how, don’t think about it as something that gives you that primal feeling of belonging or utterly isolates you, don’t look at in awe as a new Mom might look at a fuzzy infant that barely, but somehow, resembles her.
I’m scared of checking my own personal Americanness at the border, having it become something else, which it inevitably will. But perhaps I should take this fear as the most promising sign that three years in the U.S will be a travel experience, because nothing characterizes the start of a new journey more than fear, the kind that’s all wobbly and inextricably mixed with excitement.
I hope I can still notice the rolling hills of southeastern Ohio and the rough-edged bundles of hay in the fields in three years, I can still reel with an expat’s affection over a plate of eggs and bottomless cups of coffee, can still see the U.S the way I see Mexico – as a place, one I love, one that drives me mad, one I’m both a part of and separate from.
5 Comments
Oh Sarah, I love this! Both the on-spotness of the sentiment and the beauty and flow of the words. I have 2 thoughts:
(1) You will still have ‘outsiderness’ in America — the outsiderness of someone who has travelled and spent a long time abroad. I feel it when I’m back. You’ll always feel it (I predict) — and in finding friends and confidantes you will gravitate to people who have also been expats. In the same way that you’ve found something in friendships in Mexico with Americans and Canadians — it can be a good life raft, or a bad one of bitching etc. I’m sure it will be the former for you.
(2) Your perspective will NOT be dulled by routine, because you’re a writer! On a visit back to the States a year after starting to freelance in earnest (and work on my writing in earnest) I realized that I was seeing the USA in a way I never did before I lived abroad. America interests me (when I’m back) now in a way it never would have if I had not left. Not just food (since I’m a food writer) but so much more.
I look forward to reading your posts after the move.
(And BTW the word ‘locals’ bugs me too. What’s an alternative — ‘residents’? I just ran up against this last night in a piece.)
Lots of this resonates for me. yes!
and also what Robyn says, just thinking about these issues will make a difference and also you will meet others and talk about things you didn’t before your travels.
Perhaps I haven’t been reading your posts too closely, but I was surprised to read you’re leaving. Your writings on Oaxaca will be missed.
I’m a bit of a gringo myself (born there), but I’m mostly oaxaqueño. I left Oaxaca in ‘89, and only moved back in ‘07. I greatly appreciate your gringo perspective, because I feel it matches so closely with my own, although my experience comes from a rather opposite spot.
Your thoughts on going back reminded me of the (looong) time it took me to finally muster the nerve to return.
What’s it been like for me (you ask)? Well, you never go really back. You never really blend in as if you hadn’t left. You’ve been on the outside, and the inside won’t fit quite the same way as it did before. That’s why I feel so much more like a gringo now than I did before (more than I ever felt there). I think that’s a good thing.
Great writing, BTW.
Great writing and great insights.
I think you will always be able to stop and tell yourself, and others,
I´M NOT FROM AROUND HERE. At times this will be a saving sentence.
I hope at other times you enjoy being “back home” and find the parts of yourself that still respond to it, and what in it you can add to yourself for keeps.
home? is in the heart.
gabrielle, the wanderer
Thanks very much for the comments, everyone. It’s powerful to see your reaction to the concept of returning home. I’m very excited about it and also nervous. I’ll be starting graduate school and living in the states for the first time in 6 years. It’ll also be Jorge’s first time living in the U.S (we’ll see how it compares to living in Beijing – I think it was a wise move to stick him in China first so the U.S seems breezy).
Thanks again for reading and participating!
One Trackback
[...] now, it’s back to the no-longer-so-familiar United States, and I’m terrified and thrilled. I’ll be starting the MFA Program in creative nonfiction at The University of Pittsburgh in [...]